Monday, December 21, 2009

So we've gone from a bill to provide public health care to one where you're required to buy insurance in the current system

Does anyone else see a problem here? Does anyone else think that this is basically signing away lots of rights to new corporate masters? If you want to talk about statism this would be a great place to start. I mean, the folks who we'll have to buy insurance from are the same people who are the problem in the first place, and 'have to' is the operative term there. How would that in any way advance health care in this country?

No comments: